Strengthening Local Government Capacity in Central Lombok Regency, Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.62894/hc9yv778Keywords:
public service innovation, digital governance, public administration reform, local government, Central LombokAbstract
Public service innovation has become an important strategy for improving government performance and enhancing service quality in the era of decentralization and digital governance. Local governments are increasingly required to develop innovative approaches to respond to growing public demands for efficient, transparent, and accessible services. This study aims to analyze the implementation of public service innovation in Central Lombok Regency, Indonesia, particularly in improving the effectiveness and accessibility of government services. The research employs a qualitative case study approach to explore the dynamics of innovation within local public service institutions. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with government officials, analysis of policy documents, and observation of service practices in relevant public service agencies. The findings reveal that public service innovation in Central Lombok is primarily manifested through administrative simplification, integrated service delivery through the One-Stop Integrated Service Office (DPMPTSP), and the adoption of digital service platforms. These innovations have contributed to improving service efficiency, reducing bureaucratic complexity, and increasing transparency in service delivery. However, the study also identifies several challenges, including limited digital infrastructure, uneven digital literacy among citizens, and constraints in human resource capacity within local government institutions. These limitations affect the sustainability and scalability of innovation initiatives. The study concludes that strengthening institutional capacity, technological infrastructure, and collaborative governance is essential to ensure the sustainability of public service innovation. The findings contribute to the broader literature on public sector innovation, particularly in the context of decentralized governance in developing countries.
References
Bason, C. (2018). Leading public sector innovation: Co-creating for a better society. Bristol: Policy Press.
BPS Kabupaten Lombok Tengah. (2024). Kabupaten Lombok Tengah dalam angka 2024. Lombok Tengah: Badan Pusat Statistik.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management is dead—Long live digital-era governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 467–494.
Dwiyanto, A. (2020). Reformasi birokrasi publik di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Hartley, J. (2005). Innovation in governance and public services: Past and present. Public Money & Management, 25(1), 27–34.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mulgan, G. (2014). Innovation in the public sector: How can public organisations better create, improve and adapt? Public Policy Review, 10(2), 23–34.
OECD. (2017). Fostering innovation in the public sector. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Osborne, S. P., & Brown, K. (2011). Innovation, public policy and public services delivery in the UK: The word that would be king? Public Administration, 89(4), 1335–1350.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis—Into the age of austerity (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pramusinto, A. (2015). Building innovation in public service delivery in Indonesia. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, 5(3), 1–15.
Pramusinto, A., & Wicaksono, K. (2019). Public service reform in Indonesia: The role of decentralization and bureaucratic reform. Asian Politics & Policy, 11(4), 659–678.
United Nations. (2020). United Nations e-government survey 2020: Digital government in the decade of action for sustainable development. New York: United Nations.
Walker, R. M. (2008). An empirical evaluation of innovation types and organizational and environmental characteristics: Towards a configuration framework. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 591–615.
World Bank. (2021). Improving public sector performance through innovation. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mujahidin (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.










