A Smart Disaster Governance Model for Local Governments: Integrating the Internet of Things, Big Data, and Public Participation in Disaster Management

Authors

  • Lalu Ahmad Murdhani Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62894/11vs2n52

Keywords:

smart disaster governance; Internet of Things; big data; public participation; local government; disaster management; Indonesia

Abstract

This study examines the development of a smart disaster governance model for local governments in Indonesia by integrating the Internet of Things, big data, and public participation in disaster management. The study is based on the argument that disaster governance can no longer rely solely on conventional administrative procedures, sectoral reporting, and reactive emergency response. Local governments need a governance framework that enables real-time risk monitoring, interoperable disaster data, data-driven decision-making, cross-sectoral coordination, and citizen engagement. Using a qualitative case study approach, this research analyzes institutional readiness, digital disaster infrastructure, IoT-based monitoring, big data utilization, public reporting mechanisms, and participatory coordination in disaster-prone local government contexts. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, field observations, and document analysis involving regional disaster management agencies, communication and informatics offices, planning agencies, public works offices, health and social affairs offices, command center operators, disaster volunteers, community leaders, and residents in disaster-prone areas. The findings show that digital tools have begun to support disaster management, but their effectiveness remains limited by fragmented data, weak interoperability, unclear institutional responsibilities, and insufficient integration of citizen-generated information. This study proposes a smart disaster governance model consisting of six components: real-time risk monitoring, integrated disaster data platform, big data-based decision support, participatory public reporting, cross-sectoral command coordination, and accountability-based evaluation. The novelty of this study lies in integrating technological intelligence, institutional intelligence, and social intelligence into one local government disaster governance framework.

References

Achmad, K. A., Nugroho, L. E., Djunaedi, A., & Widyawan. (2018). Smart city readiness based on smart governance in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on ICT for Smart Society, 1–6.

Adeel, A., Gogate, M., Farooq, S., Ieracitano, C., Dashtipour, K., Larijani, H., & Hussain, A. (2019). A survey on the role of wireless sensor networks and IoT in disaster management. Geological Disaster Monitoring Based on Sensor Networks, 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-0992-2_6

Firdaus, A., Lestari, F., Afiff, S. A., & Herdiansyah, H. (2023). Integration of knowledge and local wisdom for disaster resilience in Anak Krakatau volcano. Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 15(1), Article a1457. https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v15i1.1457

Gaire, R., Sriharsha, C., Puthal, D., Wijaya, H., Kim, J., Keshari, P., Ranjan, R., Buyya, R., Ghosh, R. K., Shyamasundar, R. K., & Nepal, S. (2018). Internet of Things, cloud computing, and social computing enabled disaster management. Future Generation Computer Systems, 87, 549–562. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2018.02.068

Hadlos, A., Opdyke, A., & Hadigheh, S. A. (2022). Where does local and indigenous knowledge in disaster risk reduction go from here? A systematic literature review. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 79, Article 103160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103160

Herdiyanti, A., Hapsari, P. S., & Susanto, T. D. (2019). Modelling the smart governance performance to support smart city program in Indonesia. Procedia Computer Science, 161, 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.135

Kankanamge, N., Yigitcanlar, T., Goonetilleke, A., & Kamruzzaman, M. (2020). Determining disaster severity through social media analysis: Testing the methodology with South East Queensland flood tweets. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 42, Article 101360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101360

Kusumastuti, R. D., & Rouli, J. (2021). Smart city implementation and citizen engagement in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 940(1), Article 012076. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/940/1/012076

Lassa, J. A., Nappoe, G. E., & Sulistyo, S. B. (2022). Creating an institutional ecosystem for cash transfer programming: Lessons from post-disaster governance in Indonesia. Disasters, 46(4), 1085–1110.

MacAfee, E., Lohr, A. J., & de Jong, E. (2024). Leveraging local knowledge for landslide disaster risk reduction in an urban informal settlement in Manado, Indonesia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 111, Article 104710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2024.104710

Mouradian, C., Jahromi, N. T., Glitho, R. H., & Morrow, M. J. (2018). A comprehensive survey on fog computing: State-of-the-art and research challenges. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 20(1), 416–464. https://doi.org/10.1109/COMST.2017.2771153

Paudel, P. K., Parajuli, S., Sinha, R., Bohara, M., Abedin, M. A., Adhikari, B. R., Gautam, S., Bastola, R., Pal, I., & Huntington, H. P. (2024). Integrating traditional and local knowledge into disaster risk reduction policies: Insights from Nepal, India and Bangladesh. Environmental Science & Policy, 159, Article 103825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103825

Pratama, A. B. (2021). Smart city and local government innovation in Indonesia. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 17(1), 37–56.

Psomakelis, E., Aisopos, F., Litke, A., Tserpes, K., Kardara, M., Campo, P. M., & Varvarigou, T. (2016). Big IoT and social networking data for smart cities: Algorithmic improvements on big data analysis in the context of RADICAL city applications. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1607.00509

Shah, S. A., Seker, D. Z., Hameed, S., & Draheim, D. (2019). The rising role of big data analytics and IoT in disaster management: Recent advances, taxonomy and prospects. IEEE Access, 7, 54595–54614. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2913340

Shahat, E., Hyun, C. T., & Yeom, C. (2020). Conceptualizing smart disaster governance: An integrative conceptual framework. Sustainability, 12(22), Article 9536. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229536

Simmhan, Y., Ravindra, P., Chaturvedi, S., Hegde, M., & Ballari, D. (2018). Towards a data-driven IoT software architecture for smart city utilities. Software: Practice and Experience, 48(7), 1390–1416. https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.2586

Syamsidik, Oktari, R. S., Nugroho, A., Fahmi, M., Suppasri, A., Munadi, K., & Amra, R. (2021). Fifteen years of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami in Aceh-Indonesia: Mitigation, preparedness and challenges for a long-term disaster recovery process. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 54, Article 102052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102052

Wolff, E., & Muñoz, F. (2021). The techno-politics of crowdsourced disaster data in the smart city. Big Data & Society, 8(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211029452

Badan Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana. (2020). Rencana Nasional Penanggulangan Bencana 2020–2024. BNPB.

Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia. (2021). Gerakan menuju smart city: Panduan penyusunan masterplan smart city. Kementerian Komunikasi dan Informatika Republik Indonesia.

United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2015). Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015–2030. UNDRR.

United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. (2022). Global assessment report on disaster risk reduction 2022: Our world at risk. UNDRR.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-30

Issue

Section

Multidisciplinary Article

How to Cite

Lalu Ahmad Murdhani. (2026). A Smart Disaster Governance Model for Local Governments: Integrating the Internet of Things, Big Data, and Public Participation in Disaster Management. International Journal of Scientific Research, 3(01), 34-44. https://doi.org/10.62894/11vs2n52